¶ … commendation and for improvement in the paragraph regarding the availability of computers. The author has a fairly transparent degree of verve and enthusiasm for the subject, which is sometimes a key component of an insightful article (Turnquist, 2009, 437). However, he or she has the tendency to make some emotional appeals instead of relying on empirical evidence to make points. Doing so is a crucial component of scholarly writing, and one of the areas in which the author could use some improvement. The primary strength associated with this article is the author's logic. The author elucidates a number of crucial points that reinforces the paper's thesis: that computers enjoy a current degree of availability that they previously did not. However, in attempting to demonstrate his or her enthusiasm about this subject, the author has actually written about this issue from a decidedly biased viewpoint. A close analysis of the diction utilized in this article confirms this fact.

For example,...

Moreover, aside from having indubitably positive connotations, the word great is slightly colloquial and actually does not mean too much. The author would have benefitted from substituting a word for great that indicated what about the breakthrough was so positive. For instance, he or she could have said the breakthrough was valuable, useful, helpful, or any number of other adjectives that are less generic and more specific than "great."
The most disadvantageous aspect about using biased words such as great to describe points in an academic paper is that it serves to decrease the conviction of one's argument. Specifically, it does so by appealing to the emotions, and not the intellect of the reader. Emotional appeals are not appropriate for target audiences of academicians. The…